What is Passive Investing?
Passive investing is boring on purpose. You buy the whole market and stop pretending you can outsmart it.
No stock picking. No market timing. No clever strategies.
You grab an index fund or ETF, own everything, and sit on it for decades. That’s the play.
Why It Works (Even If I Don’t Love It)
The numbers don’t lie. Over 15 years, about 90% of actively managed funds underperform the S&P 500. After fees, most “smart money” managers lose to a simple index.
I’ve tried passive investing. It works. But honestly? It bored me to death.
I missed the hunt — digging through 10-Ks, spotting opportunities, proving myself right. Passive strips all that out. It’s wealth without the thrill.
Why You Should Probably Do It Anyway
Just because I love research doesn’t mean you should. Most people are better off passive. Here’s why:
You Don’t Have Time
Real stock research eats hours — filings, competitors, trends. Most people have jobs and families, not Bloomberg terminals.
You Don’t Have the Stomach
When your pick drops 30%, can you hold? Or will you panic-sell? Most investors fold. Index funds smooth that out.
The Math Is Brutal
An S&P 500 index fund charges 0.03%. The average mutual fund charges 1%. Over decades, that difference compounds into a fortune.
How Passive Investing Works
You’re not buying “nothing.” You’re buying everything.
An S&P 500 fund owns Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Berkshire Hathaway — plus 495 others. Apple jumps? You ride it. Tesla crashes? You feel it. You own it all.
Go broader with Total Market funds and you’ve got large caps, small caps, and everything in between. Some funds go global — now you own slices of Europe, Asia, and emerging markets too.
The Real Test: 2008
The financial crisis crushed everyone. The S&P 500 got cut in half. But investors who stayed in? By 2013 they were back at new highs, compounding again.
Most active managers? They missed the recovery, hiding in “safe” stocks that weren’t safe at all.
Flavors of Passive
- S&P 500 Index (SPY, VOO, IVV): 500 biggest US companies
- Total Market (VTI, SWTSX): Every US stock, top to bottom
- International (VXUS, FTIHX): Companies outside the US
- Target Date Funds: Auto-adjusts as you age
Pick one, pick a mix. Doesn’t matter. The key is buy and hold.
The Downsides (Because Nothing’s Free)
- It’s boring. No bragging rights. No “I found Tesla at $30.”
- You eat every crash. Market drops 30%? So does your account. No soft landings.
- You’ll never beat the market. Because you are the market.
- Patience required. Some years feel like watching paint dry.
Passive won’t thrill you. It just works if you can wait.
Who Should Go Passive
- Beginners who don’t want to get wrecked stock-picking
- Busy people with no time to research
- Anyone who panics when prices tank
- Long-term investors with decades to compound
Who Shouldn’t (Like Me)
If you live for balance sheets and earnings calls, active might scratch your itch. But be honest: do you actually love the research? Or do you just think you’re smarter than the market?
How to Start
- Open a brokerage — Fidelity, Vanguard, Schwab, whatever.
- Pick a broad index fund — S&P 500 or Total Market.
- Set up automatic contributions every month.
- Stop checking daily. Seriously. Just don’t.
The Buffett Test
Warren Buffett bet $1 million that an S&P 500 index fund would beat hedge funds over a decade.
He won. By a mile.
If hedge funds with armies of analysts can’t do it, why should you?
The Bottom Line
Passive investing works because it takes you out of the equation.
No emotions. No panic. No “gut calls.” Just own the market and let capitalism compound your wealth.
It won’t make you rich overnight. But over decades, boring turns into wealthy.
Is it dull? Absolutely. Does it work? The data says yes.
⚠️ This is my take, not financial advice. I prefer active because I enjoy the chase. But for most people, passive is the smarter move. Do your own research before investing.
Member discussion